Jury Nullification :: Jury Jurors Court Justice System Essays

jury NullificationJury nullification means that a venire finds a defendant innocent because the police itself is unjust, or is unjust in a particular application, and so should not be applied. So re each(prenominal)y what this means is that no mater what the law says the jury will pretty much reserve the right to choose weather the person is going to be guilty or innocent and that is kind of ok in some cases but then again its not in others so we should not expect our juries to render our laws only the case that person is be tried in and they should only judge that person on all of the facts given. Amendment VIThis is the sixth amendment and this tells you about what juries can do in cases of law. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a brisk and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and regularize wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature a nd cause of the accusation to be confronted with the witnesses against him to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense. What all of this means is that every hotshot that gets convicted of a crime gets all of the same benefits weather its a misdemeanor, felony, or capital crime. Everyone get the rights to a speedy trial and an impartial jury.Some of the people in the world always ask themselves this question when in the court room WHY DID OUR FOUNDING FATHERS appear CITIZEN JURIES TO JUDGE OUR LAWS AS WELL AS THE GUILT OF THE INDIVIDUAL ? Well the answer is really simple its Because If a juror accepts as the law that which the judge states then that juror has accepted the exercise of absolute authority of a government employee and has surrendered a military force and right that once was the citizens safeguard of liberty. (1788) (2 Elliots Debates, 94, Bancroft, History of the Constitution, 267) Jury nullifi cation of law, as it is sometimes called, is a traditional American right defended by the Founding Fathers. Those Patriots intended the jury serve as one of the tests a law must pass before it assumes enough popular authority to be enforced. Thus the Constitution provides five separate tribunals with veto power -- representatives, senate, executive, judges and jury -- that each enactment of law must pass before it gains the authority to punish those who choose to violate it.